Concept note for the first workshop
The first workshop of the Knowledge / Value series was held at the University of Chicago on June 3–4, 2011. The focus was on the nature of the fact / value distinction, and how it comes to be at stake in the contemporary moment. Questions that structured or framed the workshop included:
- What is fact? What is value?
- How do these take material, semiotic and abstract form, both historically and in their emergent forms?
- How is fact embedded in various social worlds? How is it embodied? What kinds of relationships does it constitute and get constituted by?
- What is the relationship of fact to scientific and other forms of representation, including political representation?
- How is value activated in particular ways in each of these embeddings and embodiments?
- How are fact and value co-produced, when the nature of both fact and value are at stake?
Format
Fact / Value had a component that was structured as a conference, open to the public. But it also had a day of meetings that were restricted to paper authors, discussants, and selected graduate students. Papers were pre-circulated to this group, and were discussed in small break-out groups of 7–8 people each. Discussants prepared written commentaries on the papers that were also pre-circulated.
Furthermore, a graduate seminar was run by Kaushik Sunder Rajan around the conference. This involved reading conference papers as well as key texts, by the participants and others, related to Fact / Value.
The components of all of these are reflected in this website. Since many of the papers were draft papers, they will not be available in entirety. For each author in the schedule, you get various sources relating to their paper as available: abstract, brief excerpt or summary, commentaries on the paper, and/or transcript of an interview with the graduate students of the Knowledge/Value spring seminar course.
Conference schedule
The public conference on the closing day of the workshop consisted of the following five 1h15min panels:
-
Panel 1 (9h30–10h45)
- Barbara Herrnstein Smith: “Questions of Value, Matters of Taste”.
- Commentary by Judith Farquhar.
- Interview transcript.
- James Griesemer: “Modeling Scientific Knowledge and Values”.
- Commentary by Joe Dumit.
- Barbara Herrnstein Smith: “Questions of Value, Matters of Taste”.
-
Panel 2 (10h45–12h00)
- Nadia Abu el-Haj: “The Value of (Junk) DNA”.
- Commentary by Joe Masco.
- Timothy Choy: “Atmospherics: On Substances and Subjects in Suspension”.
- Commentaries by Maira Hayat, Eric Hirsch and Kristin Peterson.
- Nadia Abu el-Haj: “The Value of (Junk) DNA”.
-
Panel 3 (13h45–15h00)
- Sheila Jasanoff: “The Practices of Objectivity in Regulatory Science”.
- Commentary by Brenna Bhandar.
- Interview transcript.
- Theodore Porter: “Tabular Reason: Recording the Insane”.
- Commentary by Jean Comaroff.
- Interview transcript.
- Sheila Jasanoff: “The Practices of Objectivity in Regulatory Science”.
-
Panel 4 (15h00–16h15)
- Kevin Brine and Mary Poovey: “From Facts to the Future: A first chapter in a history of financial models”.
- Commentary by John Comaroff.
- Interview audio file.
- Mary Morgan: “Recognising Glass Ceilings and Sticky Floors”.
- Commentary by Sabina Leonelli.
- Kevin Brine and Mary Poovey: “From Facts to the Future: A first chapter in a history of financial models”.
-
Panel 5 (16h30–17h45)
- Natasha Myers: “Life Itself Meets Liveliness: Reciprocal Capture & the Ecologies of Practice in Laboratory Life”.
- Commentaries by Gail Davies and Christien Tompkins.
- George Marcus: “Alongside...”.
- Commentary by Michael Fischer.
- Natasha Myers: “Life Itself Meets Liveliness: Reciprocal Capture & the Ecologies of Practice in Laboratory Life”.
Fact / Value conversations
These conversations happened outside of the public conference, mostly during the closed workshop and the graduate seminar on Knowledge / Value.
-
Graduate seminar conversations
- Kaushik Sunder Rajan: “Power, Knowledge and the Conjuncture of Knowledge / Value”.
Sunder Rajan - Kaushik Sunder Rajan: “Other trajectories in thinking about knowledge articulations”.
Sunder Rajan - Mary Robertson: “Neoliberalism and Knowledge / Value”.
Robertson - Meghan Morris: “Ramble on Hume”.
Morris
- Kaushik Sunder Rajan: “Power, Knowledge and the Conjuncture of Knowledge / Value”.
-
Reflections on Ludwik Fleck
- Knowledge / Value seminar student responses to “Reflections on Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact” by Ludwik Fleck.
K/V students - Barbara Herrnstein Smith: “A Fleckian explanation of Fleck”.
Herrnstein Smith - Michael Fischer: “Response to students and Barbara Herrnstein Smith”.
Fischer
- Knowledge / Value seminar student responses to “Reflections on Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact” by Ludwik Fleck.
-
Afterwords
- George Marcus: “Stakes… or a Grammar of Motives”.
Marcus - Sabina Leonelli: “Thoughts on K/V1”.
Leonelli - Conversation between Gail Davies, Sabina Leonelli and Kaushik Sunder Rajan (edited and compiled by Kaushik Sunder Rajan).
Davies, Leonelli & Sunder Rajan
- George Marcus: “Stakes… or a Grammar of Motives”.